Art & design

Here is the design brief [brief], current draft described or attached [draft], approved facts [facts] and my rough reactions [notes]. Sort feedback into factual corrections, brief mismatches, legibility questions and personal preferences. Rewrite it as a small prioritised set of actionable requests, each pointing to an element and desired result. Do not invent audience-test results or specify technical fixes you cannot verify. Preserve what already works and identify decisions only I can make. Ask which requirement matters most before suggesting another visual direction.

Make it yours: Distinguish a real brief violation from your own taste.

Here is the original proof [text or image], numbered correction list [list], revised final proof [image] and printer's actual specifications [text]. Check each requested correction against visible content, marking confirmed, not applied or impossible to inspect. Do not certify colour, resolution, bleed or production suitability from a screenshot alone. Keep new design preferences separate from missed approved corrections. Return a discrepancy list and sign-off questions for the printer. Ask which exact file version will be printed before drafting an approval message; do not approve it.

Make it yours: Inspect the actual production file with the printer, not just a compressed preview.

I need an original [number]-panel illustration for [audience and purpose]. Here are the approved story beats [beats], character reference I own [description], fixed clothing/props [details] and composition limits [limits]. Write a panel brief with consistent character identifiers, changes in action and space for editable captions. Do not add events, imitate a named artist or invent licensed characters. Flag a beat that cannot be shown clearly in one panel and ask which moment matters most before proposing the storyboard.

Make it yours: Use authorised references and check continuity in the generated images yourself.

Here is my chart [image], underlying data [table], intended audience [audience] and approved meanings [definitions]. Suggest labels, patterns or distinct markers so categories are not communicated by colour alone. Keep the data and ordering unchanged and provide a text summary grounded in the table. Do not certify accessibility from visual inspection or guess values in an unreadable image. Return a revision brief and actual checks for the designer to perform. Ask which chart distinctions carry the key message before prioritising changes.

Make it yours: Inspect the actual output and use appropriate accessibility checks; a concept review is not certification.

We need ordinary wayfinding signs for [venue event]. Approved room names, routes, language requirements and known access information are [facts], with sign sizes [dimensions] and brand rules [rules]. Create a design brief for consistent arrows, hierarchy and readable labels, plus a placement list for organiser review. Do not invent routes, certify accessibility or replace statutory emergency/safety signage. Keep temporary and permanent directions distinct. Ask which decision point currently confuses visitors before prioritising signs and request an actual walk-through test.

Make it yours: Confirm routes in the real venue and leave regulated safety signs to responsible professionals.

We need certificates for [event]. Here are approved wording, logo permissions, brand colours and recipient data represented by fictional placeholders [facts]. Brief a reusable layout with empty editable name/date fields and a separate text layer plan. Do not invent qualifications, signatures or official accreditation, and do not expose real children's data. Give a proof checklist for names, dates and print margins using actual printer guidance. Ask which text must remain editable before choosing the visual treatment.

Make it yours: Keep real recipient lists out of image-generation prompts and proof each final certificate.

Here are approved parallel texts [language A and B], intended readers [needs], page format [dimensions] and brand guidance [facts]. Propose two layout structures with clear language labels, matching section order and enough room for differing text lengths. Do not translate without permission, shrink one language to unreadable size or invent print requirements. Give a proof checklist for real readers and the printer. Ask whether readers need side-by-side comparison or uninterrupted reading before choosing a layout.

Make it yours: Have fluent readers review both language versions and test the actual printed size.

This approved table [data] must fit a printed handout of [format], following the actual printer/editor requirements [text]. Propose a layout with repeated headings, clear units and meaningful row grouping. Do not invent values, hide rows to fit the page or claim readability without a real-size proof. Separate design suggestions from changes needing the data owner's approval. Ask which columns people must compare side by side before splitting the table, and preserve source references.

Make it yours: Print or preview at actual size and check every page break.

I need a printed form for [purpose]. Here are required fields, sample answer lengths, paper size and approved privacy wording [material]. Propose a layout with realistic writing space, clear field labels, optional fields visibly marked and a review checklist using a printed draft. Do not invent required personal data, assume a digital text box gives enough handwriting room or certify accessibility without testing. Ask which answer usually needs the most space before allocating the page.

Make it yours: Try the draft with realistic fictional answers using an actual pen.

Here is my brochure text and layout description [material], the meaning carried by each colour [list], supplied printer requirements [text] and intended readers [audience]. Identify where colour is the only distinction and propose labels, patterns or grouping that preserve meaning in a monochrome version. Do not invent print specifications or claim it is legible without checking an actual proof. Return a change list and a small print-review checklist. Ask which colour-coded distinction affects a reader's action most.

Make it yours: Review an actual black-and-white print, not just the colour screen preview.

Another designer must maintain our brochure. Here is the file inventory [list], brand guide [guide], approved text [version] and documented image/font permissions [records]. Make a checklist for editable source, linked assets, exports, dimensions, colour references, ownership and unresolved dependencies. Separate supplied files from merely mentioned ones. Do not assume a font or image is licensed because it appears in the design. Suggest file names and a small edit-and-export rehearsal. Do not distribute files or alter permissions; ask what application and version the receiving designer can use.

Make it yours: List the application and version used for the editable source.

Use my menu text, logo and brand references to write a design brief for a [size and format] café menu. Customers need to scan [sections] quickly. Specify hierarchy, readable text, price alignment and how to handle confirmed dietary information. Preserve item names, prices and supplied allergen wording. Offer three distinct layout directions without copying a reference. List missing assets and production checks; do not declare the design compliant or print-ready.

Make it yours: Have the business independently verify allergen information and final printed legibility.

Review this design for [audience and task]. Assess hierarchy, legibility, contrast, spacing and whether the primary action is clear. Reference visible areas rather than giving broad taste judgements. Suggest three revisions and explain the trade-off behind each.

Make it yours: Provide the intended dimensions and context of use.

Use these approved brand references to create a brief for [asset]. Extract relevant colour roles, typography characteristics, spacing and image treatment. Distinguish mandatory rules from inferred preferences. Define what must remain editable and the original assets to use.

Make it yours: Provide one reference that clearly succeeds and explain why.

Edit this supplied product image by changing only the background to [description]. Keep the product's shape, colours, lettering, materials and position unchanged. Add no props or new product features. The image will be used for [purpose and dimensions]. If the tool cannot preserve exact details, flag that limitation. I will compare the output with the original before using it.

Make it yours: Use the original image and name the exact details that must not change.

Edit the attached image by changing [specific element] to [desired change]. Preserve [subject details], composition, camera angle and all other objects. Match the existing lighting, perspective and texture. Do not add text, logos or extra decorative elements. The intended use is [use] at [orientation].

Make it yours: List the details that must survive the edit, then inspect them in the output.

Develop three distinct visual directions for [project] aimed at [audience]. Use [brand constraints] and [references]. For each direction describe hierarchy, typography characteristics, colour roles, imagery and the intended feeling. Explain the trade-off and one reason to reject it. Avoid named-artist imitation and generic moodboard adjectives.

Make it yours: Explain where the work will appear and what the audience needs to notice first.